I read William Hutchison’s (1976) book, The Modernist Impulse in American Protestantism while in grad school some two decades ago. I had been working on mid-19th century revivalism as part of a PhD program in history at the
This history is crucially important
in terms of the purposes of the Confessing Christ network in that it laid the
foundation for 20th century Congregational religious identity, much more so, I
would argue than any formal heritage grounded in the tradition of the
Reformation. Having its roots in Bushnell, this emergence is also the result
of the influence of the “progressive” theology coming out of Yale with Noah Porter
and other liberal lights of the late 19th century. My memory
is foggy, but I have some recollection of a progressive school of theology
coming out of Andover in the same time period (D. Williams, Andover Liberals: A Study in American Theology,
1970).
.
By the
early 20th century there was a wide constellation of influences on the mainline
denominations that drew extensively on the “modernist impulse” which laid the
foundation for a broad stream of religious identity throughout the century in
which the world, broadly defined, set the context for the faith. What is
critical, in my view is an evangelical determination of what was/is valid
within the modernist impulse and what was/is questionable. Obviously there
would be no uniformity of opinion here, but a grappling with the issue in
itself could, in the right spirit open up some very fruitful dialogue.
My opinion is that there is
considerable culture lag in mainline liberalism (generally speaking) based on issues
raised a century ago. Any substantial
reconstruction of UCC collective identity is going to require the most profound
discernment of the relevance of those issues for the contemporary setting,
including a close examination of what was lost as well as gained by embracing
the trajectory of the modernist impulse.
A deep appreciation for the transcendence
of God would, I think, be a key factor in a way that disambiguates it from
any vestiges of fundamentalism (and the modernist/fundamentalist wars of the
early 20th century). A key for the evangelical community is the need to come to
grips with the social gospel disambiguated from any vestiges of a telos of
progress or any equation of the Kingdom
of God with the
brotherhood of man. Both of these are old issues. Nonetheless, I suggest,
they are still active as an unconscious force in the collective psyche among at
least many who are grappling with this conflict, whether from the liberal or
evangelical camp.
I do agree on the importance of
grounding UCC identity within the Reformed tradition. However, I believe
that that effort can only remain problematic until these more recent conflicts
within Protestant liberalism are more decisively worked through. There might
be some considerable value in placing keen attention on grappling with these
early 20th century conflicts and their concomitant culture lags. The
result could be a more likely prospect of realizing an ecumenical identity with
strong evangelical-reformed roots than currently operative, and at least some
lessening of the culture wars within the denomination toward a more fruitful
theological dialogue. Such a
development, in turn, could have rich implications for ecclesiology, missions,
social outreach, and personal piety. I
hope to address these issues more fully at a later time in book form. (Blogger's Note) In fact I have done so, as some of you know, in In Quest of a Vital Protestant Center: An Ecumenical Evangelical Perspective. http://www.amazon.com/Quest-Vital-Protestant-Center-Evangelical/dp/162564048X
No comments:
Post a Comment